April 25, 2008

New York City Cops Acquitted After Shooting an Unarmed Man







Source: The New York Times

CantonTruth Comments in blue


In the early morning hours of Nov. 25, 2006, Sean Bell, a 23-year-old New York City man due to be married later that day, walked out of a Queens strip club, climbed into a gray Nissan Altima with two friends who had been celebrating with him - and died in a hail of 50 bullets fired by a group of five police officers.


The shooting shocked the city and brought back memories of the deaths in other high-profile police shootings - in particular, the death of Amadou Diallo, an African peddler killed after police fired 41 shots at him in 1999. Both men were black and both were unarmed, although in both cases the officers appeared to have believed the suspect had a gun.


Believing that someone has a gun does not justify murdering them. If it does then any police officer that pulls you over has the right to open fire on you if he only BELIEVES that you may have a gun.


While the death of Mr. Bell did not prompt the same levels of rage and protest as the Diallo case, it prompted unsettling questions about the changes in police procedures adopted in recent years, and about whether black men remained unfairly singled out for aggressive police action.
On March 16, 2007, a Queens grand jury voted to indict three detectives in the case, charging the two who had fired the bulk of the shots,Detective Michael Oliver and Detective Gescard F. Isnora, with first-degree and second-degree manslaughter, and the third, Detective Marc Cooper, with reckless endangerment.

The three pleaded not guilty, and in the days before the trial began on Feb. 25, 2008, defense lawyers made clear that they were going to concentrate on potential justification for the first two shots fired by Detectives Oliver and Isnora. In particular, they were expected to focus on evidence that Mr. Bell was intoxicated and on a statement by one of Mr. Bell's companion that there had been talk outside the nightclub that someone had a gun. The officers have said they followed Mr. Bell and his companions in the belief that they were going to retrieve a gun following a dispute outside the club.
During the trial, defense lawyers pointed to forensic evidence that suggested that the firing only began after Mr. Bell rammed his car into an unmarked police van. They also accused Mr. Bell's companions of lying on the witness stand.


Even if the firing didn't start until after Mr. Bell rammed his car into an unmarked police van the question still remains of why were there 50 shots fired. All three men were unarmed and were no threat to the police officers. True the were intoxicated but this does not give the police the right to open fire at you let alone to fire 50 times.


On April 25, 2008, Justice Arthur J. Cooperman, who heard the case alone after the detectives waived their right to a jury, acquitted all three men of all the charges against them. -- April 25, 2008


It can also be said that the detectives waived their right to a jury so that no human side could be brought into the court room. If there is no jury to try to convince that you acted appropriately then you only have to convince one man. Sean Bell was murdered by the New York City Police Department and his killers have just been acquitted.

No comments: